Go to main navigation Navigation menu Skip navigation Home page Search

New study: The world’s happiest countries – but how does it affect us personally?

How are we affected by repeatedly hearing that we live in one of the world’s happiest countries? A new study from the Center for Wellbeing, Welfare and Happiness at the Stockholm School of Economics (SSE) shows that global happiness rankings do not only reflect how people feel. They can also influence how we perceive our own happiness and that of others.

At the end of March each year, the World Happiness Report is published. It ranks around 140 countries based on residents’ self-reported life satisfaction. The Nordic countries consistently place near the top, and Finland has been named the world’s happiest country for several years. But what happens psychologically when a country repeatedly receives the label “the world’s happiest”?

To explore this question, researchers at the Stockholm School of Economics conducted a study in connection with the release of the World Happiness Report 2024. In total, 8,000 survey responses were collected from people in Finland, Sweden, Denmark, and Norway — during the week before and the week after the report’s publication — to examine whether the ranking affected how people evaluated their own happiness and that of others.

Small but clear differences between countries

The results show that the effects differ across the Nordic countries. In Sweden and Denmark, perceptions of how happy other people in the country are increased after the report was published. In Finland — which once again ranked first — researchers instead observed a small but statistically significant decrease in individuals’ own life satisfaction in connection with the top ranking. In other words, when Finland became the world’s happiest country, Finns’ happiness declined slightly.

“When an entire country receives the label ‘the world’s happiest,’ it can trigger a kind of self-reflection. If we are the happiest in the world, why don’t I feel happier?” says Micael Dahlen, Professor and Director of the Center for Wellbeing, Welfare and Happiness, and the lead researcher behind the study.

To explain the decline in happiness among Finns after the report’s release, the researchers introduce the concept of “happycondria.” The term builds on earlier research on social comparison and self-evaluation, where self-doubt emerges when people begin to question their own happiness in relation to the idealized image being communicated. Collective success becomes a personal benchmark — which can ultimately make us feel less happy.

“Happycondria describes the feeling and pressure that we ought to be happier. If you only feel mediocre in one of the world’s happiest countries, it can create a sense of failure,” Dahlen continues.

Media coverage plays a role

The study also includes an analysis of national media coverage in connection with the report’s release. The analysis shows that the World Happiness Report received extensive attention in the Nordic countries — particularly in Finland.

In Sweden, the population was exposed to the news at least once on average, and after the report’s release one in four Swedes could correctly identify the country’s fourth place in the ranking. In Finland, the impact was significantly greater. On average, people were exposed to seven news items about the country’s ranking, and after the report’s release nine out of ten Finns knew that Finland had once again been named the world’s happiest country.

The media narrative also differed between countries. In Finland, headlines emphasizing that the country was once again “the world’s happiest” dominated. In Denmark, coverage was also largely positive, while Swedish media often highlighted Finland’s first place. In Norway, reporting tended to emphasize that the country ranked lowest among the Nordic countries.

According to Micael Dahlen, both the scale and the framing of media coverage likely influence how the results are perceived by the public.

Rankings can influence what they measure

The researchers emphasize that the observed effects are small. At the same time, the findings point to an important principle: happiness measurements do not only measure wellbeing — they can also influence it.

“Our results show that happiness metrics are not neutral. When they become visible and receive widespread media attention, they become part of the social context that shapes how people perceive and report their own and others’ wellbeing. They become narratives that shape how we see ourselves and each other,” Micael Dahlen concludes.

Facts: World Happiness Report

The World Happiness Report (WHR) is an annual international report that ranks around 140 countries based on residents’ self-reported life satisfaction. The ranking is based on data from the Gallup World Poll and the so-called Cantril scale, where people evaluate their lives on a scale from the worst to the best possible life. In recent years, Sweden has ranked fourth, behind Finland, Denmark, and Iceland. Finland has been ranked the world’s happiest country for eight consecutive years. The next World Happiness Report will be published on March 19, 2026.

CWWH News