• Login
  • Contact
  • About
    • Objectives
    • Organization
    • People
    • Partners
    • Job opportunities
    • Annual reports
    • Women in Finance
  • Research
    • Academic Seminars
    • Publications
    • Research in the spotlight
    • Disclosure policy
  • National PhD program
    • Core courses
    • Mini courses
    • PhD visitor program
    • National PhD conferences
    • PhD Seminars
    • Job market candidates
    • PhD Placements
  • Outreach
    • Academic seminars
    • Conferences
    • Industry seminars
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • News & press
      • News
      • In the press
      • Newsletters
    • Data Visualizations
  • Data Center
    • SHoF Data center – a national mission
    • Fama French Factors
    • FinBas
    • Historical Archives
    • NASDAQ HFT
    • Nordic Compass, SHoF's ESG Database
    • PAtLink
    • Serrano
    • SHoF Fund Data Morningstar
    • News
  • About
    • Objectives
      • Our guiding principles
    • Organization
      • Board
      • Management committee
      • SHoF advisory board
      • Scientific advisory board
      • Department of Finance SSE
    • People
      • Resident researchers
      • Academic partner visitors
      • Affiliated researchers
      • Postdoctoral fellows
      • Research assistants
      • Job market candidates
      • PhD students
      • Admininistration
      • Outreach
      • Data center
      • Advisors
    • Partners
      • Academic partners
      • Partners
    • Job opportunities
    • Annual reports
    • Women in Finance
      • Events
      • Videos & podcasts
      • Featured research
      • News & press
      • Women in Finance Data
  • Research
    • Academic Seminars
    • Publications
    • Research in the spotlight
    • Disclosure policy
  • National PhD program
    • Core courses
    • Mini courses
    • PhD visitor program
    • National PhD conferences
    • PhD Seminars
    • Job market candidates
    • PhD Placements
  • Outreach
    • Academic seminars
    • Conferences
    • Industry seminars
    • Videos
      • Interviews by Swedish House of Finance
      • SNS/SHoF Finance panels videos
      • Seminar videos
      • Conference videos
      • Annual Conference videos
    • Podcasts
    • News & press
      • News
      • In the press
      • Newsletters
    • Data Visualizations
      • The SUSY Monitor
      • Does Carbon Pricing Work? Evidence from Swedish Firms
      • Designing a Carbon Tax Policy That Works
      • Women in Finance Data
  • Data Center
    • SHoF Data center – a national mission
      • Terms and conditions
      • Academic advisory group
    • Fama French Factors
    • FinBas
      • Stocks Timeseries
      • Indices Timeseries
    • Historical Archives
      • Stocks list archive
      • Annual reports archive
      • Affärsvärlden Archive
      • Owners and Power
    • NASDAQ HFT
      • Reconstructed Order Book
      • Nordic Market Quality
    • Nordic Compass, SHoF's ESG Database
    • PAtLink
    • Serrano
    • SHoF Fund Data Morningstar
      • Valuations: Daily TNA and net flow by fund and fund share class
      • Re-invested Prices: Dividends re-invested prices
      • Splits: Fund split date and split ratio
      • Dividends: Fund dividends
      • Prices: Fund daily prices
    • News
  • Login
  • Contact
  • Swedish House of Finance
  • Outreach
  • News & press
  • News
  • Nobel Prize 2022: What is the role of banks in financial crises?
Swedish House of Finance
  • About
  • Research
  • National PhD program
  • Outreach
    • Academic seminars
    • Conferences
    • Industry seminars
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • News & press
      • News
      • In the press
      • Newsletters
    • Data Visualizations
  • Data Center

Nobel Prize 2022: What is the role of banks in financial crises?

Article by Fathin Ungku

dec. 05, 2022

We sat down with our former director, Per Strömberg, a professor of finance at the Stockholm School of Economics and a member of the Nobel Prize Committee to discuss this year's economic sciences laureates. Their research has shaped the way we deal with financial crises, he says.

Our lives are closely intertwined with banks and financial systems. We get our salaries in our bank accounts, from where we make payments for our everyday essentials; with just the tap of a card, we get access to food, transport, and clothes. Banks are also involved in our lives during those big moments, like buying our first home or actualizing a business that we have dreamt of for years. 

Yet, few can articulate what banks are, why they exist and why failures in the banking system can lead to disastrous crises that persist for a long time.

Ben Bernanke, Douglas Diamond and Philip Dybvig were awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics “for research on banks and financial crises”, which has improved how society deals with financial crises. The key finding in their research is why avoiding bank collapses is vital.

“They provide the foundation of what is now the modern understanding of banks: the role banks play in the economy, why we have financial crisis and why we need banks to be regulated,” Strömberg said.

“We think it's very important for economics, because it's made a huge impact on tons of research following their work, and also for practice, because a lot of modern thinking about regulation of the financial system, and how you fight financial crises, rests on their research,” he added.

Which came first, bank failure or depression?

Ben Bernanke wrote his winning paper in 1983, analyzing the Great Depression in the 1930s using empirical and historical data.

“(Bernanke) convinced the research community that the failure of banks and panic was really the reason why the Great Depression became so deep,” Strömberg said. “This was a huge break with the perceived wisdom at the time.”

Before Bernanke’s paper, the consensus among financial researchers about the bank failures in the 1930s was that they were a consequence of the depression. 

Another view by economists Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, proposed that while the bank failures were important for the recession turning into a deep depression, it was primarily for monetary reasons, since bank deposits are part of money supply. They argued that the reason why the depression became longer and deeper than it should have been was because the Fed at the time did not print more money.

“They were very money-oriented,” Strömberg said. “Bernanke however, said that the bank failures were indeed important, not primarily because they shrank money supply but because when banks failed, firms and households couldn't get credit. And that had a huge effect on their performance and investment which fed into the economy, leading to a great depression.”

What are banks and why is it important they don’t fail?

Diamond and Dybvig meanwhile, developed a theoretical model explaining for the first time-- building from first principles-- the central mechanisms of banking: why it works, and how the system is inherently vulnerable and needs regulation.

Their model is based upon households saving some of their income, as well as needing to be able to withdraw their money when they wish. No one knows in advance if or when the need for money will arise, but this does not happen at the same time for every household. In the meantime, there are investment projects that need financing. These projects are profitable in the long-term, but if they are terminated early, the returns will be very low. 

A liquidity problem arises in a world without banks. Households want to make sure that they have access to their funds whenever they want while borrowers need the assurance that they do not have to pay back their debt for at least a certain number of years.

“What Diamond and Dybvig’s model shows is that a bank, or an institution like a bank, solves this problem because as long as everyone is not going to need liquidity at the same time, you can pool all of these deposits, and use this money to lend to long term investment. That's what they mean by maturity transformation,” Strömberg said.

However, Diamond and Dybvig’s model also found that if depositors, for any reason, think that a bank might fail, they will rush to the bank to get their money, resulting in a self-fulfilling bank run. 

“How do we avoid that outcome? Diamond and Dybvig showed that if we have deposit insurance, then we don't have to rush to the bank because we know we get our money back. Or if the central bank provides emergency loans to this bank, we know we will be safe,” Strömberg explained. 

“Avoiding runs on financial institutions is what modern banking regulation is all about”.

Banks monitor borrowers but who monitors banks?

In a separate paper, Diamond analyzes how lenders ensure borrowers honor their commitments. He explained that it is easier and cheaper for depositors who have directly or indirectly invested in a project to delegate credit evaluation and investment progress monitoring to banks instead of doing it individually.

But if the bank is monitoring the borrowers to ensure their investments are sound, who is monitoring the banks? Diamond showed that the way in which banks are organized means they do not need to be monitored by the depositors at all.

“The reason we don't have to it is because banks lend to thousands of companies, not just one. If banks do their monitoring job correctly, the occasional firm might still fail but if you have lent to 10,000 different firms, it's predictable what those credit risks are given that the bank does its job,” Strömberg said.

“If the bank runs out of money, then we know that the bank hasn't done its  job. We can then put that bank in bankruptcy and get our money back. We can discipline the bank without having to monitor it,” he said, adding that it is in the bank’s interest to monitor its borrowers without the depositors needing to monitor the bank.

 

Per Strömberg

Researcher, SHoF

SSE Centennial Professor of Finance and Private Equity, Department of Finance, SSE

Read more

Bernanke, Diamond and Dybvig on why they started doing research on banks and financial crises
Q&A with Per Strömberg

How are the laureates’ findings relevant today, amid a fast-evolving banking and finance sector?

There's a constant fight between regulating more activities and the temptation to move such activities outside of the regulatory system where you don't have to have capital requirements and regulators looking over your shoulder.

It’s a constant race between new players popping up trying to do things outside and the regulator trying to extend the regulatory net. Before the financial crisis, the shadow banking sector was allowed to just grow and grow. But now, I think regulators are 100% on top of the fact that there are new players coming in, and we need to quickly assess them and see if we need to bring them under the regulatory system. Thanks to Diamond and Dybvig for example, we know what we're looking for: do the new players engage in maturity transformation? If the answer is yes, then they should be regulated.

Wouldn’t the guarantee of a bailout cause some problems, like too much risk-taking by banks?

Financial regulators very quickly realised, that while they have managed to stop the panic, they have also bailed out some players that took very risky bets. And that could lead to future problems, because if these institutions know they’re going to be bailed out by the government in the future, then will misbehave and take excessive risks.

So, a lot of regulation from 2009-2010 and onwards has been aimed at preventing excessive risk-taking in financial institutions. This includes regulations like higher capital requirements and liquidity requirements that need to be adhered to. Banks must now have “living wills”, or a plan for how they will be able to handle a bankruptcy without causing major disruptions to financial markets. There is a whole lot of additional regulation that restricts what banks do in normal times as well, so that they don't take advantage of this bailout guarantee if a crisis hits, and this should mitigate the risk of a subsequent crisis.

How has the laureates’ research helped making the financial system more resilient to risks stemming from the economic crisis we are facing today?

We have a much more solid financial system today than we had 10-15 years ago. So if there is a bad economic downturn today, the financial system is much more resilient thanks the regulation introduced over the last 10 years, which in turn builds on the  insights from Bernanke, Diamond and Dybvig.  But new players emerge all the time, and runs on unregulated financial institutions can still happen – the recent FTX collapse was in many ways a Diamond-Dybvig moment – but thanks to this research, we are better equipped to handle them.

  • About
    • Objectives
    • Organization
    • People
    • Partners
    • Job opportunities
    • Annual reports
    • Women in Finance
  • Research
    • Academic Seminars
    • Publications
    • Research in the spotlight
    • Disclosure policy
  • National PhD program
    • Core courses
    • Mini courses
    • PhD visitor program
    • National PhD conferences
    • PhD Seminars
    • Job market candidates
    • PhD Placements
  • Outreach
    • Academic seminars
    • Conferences
    • Industry seminars
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • News & press
      • News
      • In the press
      • Newsletters
    • Data Visualizations
  • Data Center
    • SHoF Data center – a national mission
    • Fama French Factors
    • FinBas
    • Historical Archives
    • NASDAQ HFT
    • Nordic Compass, SHoF's ESG Database
    • PAtLink
    • Serrano
    • SHoF Fund Data Morningstar
    • News

Swedish House of Finance

Bertil Ohlins gata 4, 113 50 Stockholm

info@houseoffinance.se +46 8 736 91 00
Subscribe