Anders Olofsgård, Maria Perrotta and Emmanuel Frot. SITE Working Paper
In this paper we argue that aid effectiveness may suffer when partnerships with new
regimes need to be established. We test this argument using the natural experiment
of the break-up of communism in the former Eastern Bloc. We find that commercial
and strategic concerns influenced both aid flows and the urgency of entry into new
partnerships in the first half of the 1990s, while developmental objectives became more
important only over time. These results hold up to a thorough sensitivity analysis,
including using a gravity model to instrument for bilateral trade flows. We also find
that aid fractionalization increased substantially, and that aid to the region was more
likely to be tied, more volatile and less predictable than to aid to other recipients at
the time. Overall, these results suggest that the guidelines for aid effectiveness agreed
upon in the Paris Declaration are likely to be challenged by the current political
transition in parts of the Arab world. Hopefully being aware of these challenges can
help donors avoid making the same mistakes.
Dwnload pdf